vpn下
Meta
  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

vp下载苹果
Download Lectures on Biostatistics (1971). Corrected and searchable version of Google books edition

Download review of Lectures on Biostatistics (THES, 1973).

Latest Tweets
  • "An anti-EU movement can’t also be anti-US, not without looking as if it hates everyone" by @Freedland www.theguardian.com/commentisf…

  • Boris: "less a lovable maverick than a rather unpleasant oddball." by @Freedland 大数据告诉你,为什么你逛个草榴就贷不到款了!-焦点新闻 ...:2021-9-30 · 日前,最高法、最高检、公安部联合下发规定,明确网页、微博客、朋友圈、贴吧等网络平台发布的信息属电子数据,法院、检察院和公安机关有权依法向有关单位和个人收集、调取据电子数据作为定案依据。规定将从2021年10月1日起施行。

  • RT @MartinShovel: My cartoon - is our #NHS safe in #Tory hands? #efficiencysavings #weaselwords pic.twitter.com/muYCcCPCZL

  • @CaulfieldTim sure! But it's 1 am. here -good night

  • @CaulfieldTim sounds good. But the problems mostly lie with academics. Self-inflicted wounds

  • @CaulfieldTim Trudeau looks great. Can we have him please?

  • @CaulfieldTim Here is an early example www.xckyj.in2bookssavannah.com/2007/12/05/w… and recent ones www.xckyj.in2bookssavannah.com/2014/11/02/t…

  • RT @taslimanasreen: Had meeting with Elmar Brok, Chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs at the European Parliament today. pic.twitter.com/sb9lYfqKD6

  • RT @taslimanasreen: I spoke at the European Parliament today about how freethinkers getting killed,& govt remains silent in Bangladesh. pic.twitter.com/rW0XW5KBw9

  • @CaulfieldTim no, it isn't fair to blame reporting. They hypsecomes from jml and university PR people, endorsed by authors

  • Exactly. Bur publishers make cash publishing junk, and senior academics push you to publish every 10 min. Disaster 男子私自搭建VPN服务器非法获利50余万元被判刑_新闻中心 ...:2021-12-20 · 正义网贵港12月20日电(通讯员 杨德灿)吴向洋在未取得《增值电信业务经营许可证》的情况下,在网络上销售VPN企理服务,根据《中华人民共和国电信条例》和《中国人民共和国刑法》等相关法律规定,吴向洋涉嫌非法经营罪。

  • @CaulfieldTim harms science because every time the latest diet/exercise advice appears in the media, people just jeer (often rightly)

  • @CaulfieldTim do you think there's a case for stopping obs epidemiology? It so often gives wrong answer, harms people & harms science

  • How does such dubious junk science get published. I often wonder twitter.com/CaulfieldTim/statu…

  • If there was ever a case for reverse causality, that's it twitter.com/CaulfieldTim/statu…

Categories
Archives

DC’s front page

Look at the right hand sidebar for the latest pages, posts and comments.

First-time comments are moderated: after that they appear straight away.

This blog is written by David Colquhoun. You can Email me.

Jump to Latest diary entry Click here.

Updates. Click here to get a brief email when new items added.

Twitter feed is in left sidebar, below ‘recently read’.
Updates on Twitter @david_colquhoun. Follow @david_colquhoun
.

Notice. The huge traffic generated by the posting of Stefan Grimm’s last email brought down the server for an hour or two on December 3rd. Since it went up at 18.30 on 2nd December, it has been getting a hit every second or so. This has been cured by introduction of a caching system, but this had the side effect of breaking links to most of the pictures and documents on this blog. I now have to correct the links manually on 386 posts and 17 pages. This will take a while to complete.

Truly gobsmacked to find this blog got first prize at the 《绝地求生》吃鸡卡顿怎么办 国服最新免费加速器分享-社会 ...:2021-3-31 · 关于加速器的选择-大家还是多下几个加速器试用下,或者自己搭建一个VPN,我现在就是用的自己搭建的VPN几个朋友用,不看视频只玩游戏3M完全不卡 .... It was shared with PhD student, Suzi Gage vp下载. We must have been the youngest and the oldest entrants. More in the diary.

vpn下

sciblog

 

Not sure what I did to get this from the New Statesman. Perhaps it was some comments about David Willetts?.
NS blog

 

Another unsolicited testimonial: this blog appeared in the Sunday Times guide to the 100 best blogs (May 2009)

This blog is archived by the British Library.


22 December 2012. A post in 2006, now removed, criticised the organisation CancerActive, for selling D-mannose and Chloralla with the suggestion that they might help people with cancer. In May 2012, I added to that post a quotation from one of several authors who claimed that there was an a priori case for investigating the relationship between the business and the charitable activities of CancerActive. Mr Woollams then threated to sue me for defamation. As a consequence, the original post has been removed and I am required to publish the following apology. It’s better than destitution.

7 November 2013. My agreement with Chris Woollams’ lawyers was that the apology should be shown for 6 months. It has now been up for almost 11 months. I am, therefore, removing it. It was, of course, bullied out of me by the threat of destitution. Now, thanks in part to people like him, we have a new Defamation Act. This sort of thing should be much less common in the future.

DC’s Improbable Science., at xckyj.in2bookssavannah.com, now comes from a server powered by those wonderful people at The Positive Internet Company. I am enormously grateful to Alex Lomas for his expert help in making the move.

Lime tree in UCL quad, under which I have lunch and talk in summer.
(Older pictures here)
vp下载
).
click picture to enlarge



Click picture to watch the Sherlock Holmes video clip (ITV)

vpn下

“What are you going to do, then?” I [Watson] asked. “To smoke,” he [Holmes] answered. “It is quite a three-pipe problem, and I beg that you won’t speak to me for fifty minutes.”  The Red-Headed League. Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, Arthur Conan-Doyle.  Posted after seeing Roger Llewellyn in “VPNFilter”席卷全球 安全专家为防范最新恶意软伀支招_央广网:2021-5-25 · 央广网上海5月25日消息(记者傅闻捷 韩晓余 通讯员杨文)5月23日晚,思科公司Talos团队发布预警称,一款名为“VPNFilter”的最新恶意软伀正在全球蔓延,预估有54个国家遭入侵,受感染设备的数量至少为 50 万台。.


This WordPress blog continues, in a new format, the original DC’s IMPROBABLE SCIENCE Page. Older entries from there are being transferred here as time allows.

This blog now incorporates ‘DC’s goodscience’, which was centred on university politics, in particular, how science should be organised to get the best results, and the invidious rise of management bollocks and corporatisation. It was started as a vehicle for an extended version of an article that I wrote for the Times Higher Education Supplement, HOW TO GET GOOD SCIENCE. This extended version has now been printed in full in the Physiology News, 69, 12 – 14, 2007 [download the pdf version].


Tell a Friend

News items.

Guardian science podcast is here.

A paper that came out in 2008 was the most fascinating I’ve been involved in for years. On the nature of partial agonism in the nicotinic receptor superfamily. This is the day job, and so not mentioned much here. But this one represents over three years of hard work, especially by Remigijus Lape, and for once it came out well -positively sexy (if you like ion channels). It featured on UCL News. See also the News and Views in Nature and Making the paper in Nature.

UCL Lunch hour lecture. 16 October, 2007.Science in an Age of Delusions: some examples from scientific fraud, quackery, religion and university politics.

See it here. [Seems that this got the biggest audience of the 2007 lectures]


Biography

  • Wikipedia
  • Interview in Molecular Interventions (2002)
  • Society for Neuroscience, scholars

 

Some older sites (really they are all about various consequences of the endarkenment). None of these are now maintained.

  • DC’s Improbable Science page
  • DC’s politics page
  • Education and religion
  • Committee for UCL. The pages that helped to thwart the 2002 attempt to merge UCL into Imperial.
  • Save UCL. The much wittier and more elegant site written by a Graduate student at the time of the 2002 takeover attempt by Imperial. See especially “ask Jeremy“.

My day job pages

  • My original home page (no longer maintained)
  • My corporate home page
  • OneMol New site: a one stop shop for the single ion channel group at UCL, http://www.onemol.org.uk/
  • Our Publications page
  • Publications -theoretical papers
  • Our computer programs for analysis of single ion channel results (now on the OneMol site: the UCL site is defunct).
  • Our summer course on matrix algebra, with applications to analysis of stochastic properties of single ion channels
  • vp下载

Here is a movie, made by Faculti, about my day job. You can get reprints of the 2004 and 2008 papers form the OneMol site.

 

I just noticed that the ResearcherID button, above, takes you to a site that doesn’t list my most highly cited work. Like other commercial sites it fails to list citations to books or book chapters. Google does that better, and cheaper.

StumbleUpon icon Submit to StumbleUpon

This page has been loadedtimes.

[reached the first half-million on July 3rd 2008]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

twitter加速器官网下载

« Previous 1 2
  • @Teige
    You are quite right to question subjective impressions of the efficacy of some unproven intervention, and look to proper research and systematic reviews as a way of eliminating bias or even self-delusion.

    However, taking notes of outcomes in a single-handed private practice is not going to help much. Audit is about modifying existing clinical protocols to refine and improve practice. It applies in areas where there is already a broadly agreed approach which produces positive results, but identifies changes in the protocol that are likely to improve outcome.

    Clinical audit of IVF and acupuncture won’t tell you if acupuncture works for IVF or not. In fact until you know that there is a proven method of using acupuncture to improve IVF outcome, then it doesn’t make sense to engage in the audit cycle. It’s like trying to redecorate a house that hasn’t been built yet.

    Isobelmat’s phrase of “disseminating good practice” is a nonsense. The premise of that phrase is that the technique is already reasonably efficacious. That is completely unproven. So you end up with trying to say what is a “better” way to produce the same null result.
    It would seem that despite all her self-proclaimed qualifications, this nurse doesn’t seem to understand the difference between research and clinical audit: demonstrating a lack of intellectual rigour that so often accompanies a lack of discernment in matters of clinical evidence.